Pregnancy spacing is an essential part of family planning. Understand the importance of pregnancy spacing and what factors to consider before you conceive again.
By Mayo Clinic Staff
Considering having another child? Pregnancy spacing can affect more than how close your children are in age. It can also have an impact on your health and your baby's health. Find out what you need to know about family planning and timing pregnancies.
Whether you're thinking about getting pregnant for the first time or you already have children, it's important to think about family planning and your reproductive goals. Knowing whether you do or don't want to have children in the next few years can help you and your partner choose appropriate contraception — such as birth control pills, contraceptive injections or implants, or an intrauterine device (IUD). Family planning can also help you determine when you might begin preconception planning, which is sometimes recommended up to a year in advance of getting pregnant.
After your first child is born, family planning takes on new meaning. Having another child will change your family's lives. Are you and your partner ready to take care of a newborn again? How will your other child or children react to sharing your attention with a new baby? It's also important to consider the timing of your pregnancies. While you and your partner might have preferences about how close in age you'd like your children to be, some studies show that spacing pregnancies too close together or too far apart can pose health risks for both mother and baby.
Limited research suggests that a pregnancy within 12 months of giving birth is associated with an increased risk of:
- The placenta partially or completely peeling away from the inner wall of the uterus before delivery (placental abruption)
- The placenta attaching to the lower part of the uterine wall, partially or totally covering the cervix (placenta previa), in women who previously had a C-section
A 2011 study also suggests a link between pregnancy intervals of less than 12 months and autism risk in second-born children.
In addition, a pregnancy within 18 months of giving birth is associated with an increased risk of:
- Low birth weight
- Small size for gestational age
- Preterm birth
- Uterine rupture in women who attempt vaginal birth after a C-section (VBAC)
Some experts believe that closely spaced pregnancies don't give a mother enough time to recover from the physical stress of one pregnancy before moving on to the next. For example, pregnancy and breast-feeding can deplete your stores of essential nutrients, such as iron and folate. If you become pregnant before replacing those stores, it could affect your health or your baby's health.
It's also possible that behavioral risk factors, such as smoking, substance abuse, failure to use health care services and unplanned pregnancies, as well as stress and socioeconomic disadvantage, are more common in women who have closely spaced pregnancies. These risk factors — rather than the short interval itself — might explain the link between closely spaced pregnancies and health problems for mothers and babies.
Research suggests that long intervals between pregnancies also pose concerns for mothers and babies. A pregnancy five years or more after giving birth is associated with an increased risk of:
- High blood pressure and excess protein in your urine after 20 weeks of pregnancy (preeclampsia)
- Slow or difficult labor or delivery (dystocia)
- Preterm birth
- Low birth weight
- Small size for gestational age
It's not clear why long pregnancy intervals are linked to health problems for mothers and babies. Some experts believe that pregnancy improves uterine capacity to promote fetal growth and support, but that over time these beneficial physiological changes disappear. It's also possible that maternal age or unmeasured factors, such as maternal illnesses, may play a role.
To reduce the risk of pregnancy complications and other health problems, limited research suggests waiting at least 18 to 24 months but no more than five years after a live birth before attempting your next pregnancy. However, further research is needed to determine whether the effects of birth spacing on maternal and fetal health differ between developed and developing nations.
Still, choosing when to have another baby is a personal decision. When planning your next pregnancy, you and your partner might consider various factors in addition to the health risks and benefits, including your health, age, fertility, relationship, how many children you have, how many children you hope to have, access to health care, child-rearing support, and social and economic circumstances.
Until you make a decision about when to have another child, be sure to use a reliable method of birth control — even if you're breast-feeding. Once you feel ready to get pregnant again, ask your health care provider for guidance.
There's no perfect time to have another baby. And, even with careful planning, you can't always control when conception happens. However, understanding the risks and benefits associated with timing your pregnancies too close together or too far apart can help you make an informed decision about when to grow your family.
May 27, 2011
- Report of a WHO technical consultation on birth spacing. World Health Organization. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2007/WHO_RHR_07.1_eng.pdf. Accessed Jan. 20, 2011.
- Closely spaced pregnancies are associated with increased odds of autism in California sibling births. Pediatrics. 2011;127:246.
- Stubblefield PG. Interpregnancy interval and pregnancy outcome. http://www.uptodate.com/home/index.html. Accessed Feb. 17, 2011.
- Eijsden MV, et al. Association between short interpregnancy intervals and term birth weight: The role of folate depletion. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2008;88:147.
- Grisaru-Granovsky S, et al. Effect of interpregnancy interval on adverse perinatal outcomes - A national study. Contraception. 2009;80:512.
- Sholapurkar SL. Is there an ideal interpregnancy interval after a live birth, miscarriage or other adverse pregnancy outcomes? Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2010;30:107.
- HTSP 101: Everything you want to know about healthy timing and spacing of pregnancy. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/pmnch/topics/maternal/htsp101.pdf. Accessed Sept. 3, 2010.
- Conde-Agudelo A, et al. Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2006;295:1809.
- King JC. The risk of maternal nutritional depletion and poor outcomes increases in early or closely spaced pregnancies. The Journal of Nutrition. 2003;133:1732S.
- Healthy people 2020 summary of objectives. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/pdfs/FamilyPlanning.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2011.
- Preconception care questions and answers. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/preconception/QandA.htm. Accessed April 1, 2011.
- Kottke M. Nondaily contraceptive options: User benefits, potential for high continuation and counseling issues. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 2008;63:661.
- Recovering from birth. The National Women's Health Information Center. http://womenshealth.gov/pregnancy/childbirth-beyond/recovering-from-birth.cfm. Accessed April 1, 2011.
- Harms RW (expert opinion). Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. April 4, 2011.
- Your Pregnancy and Childbirth Month to Month. 5th ed. Washington, D.C.: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 2010;282.
- Bujold E, et al. Risk of uterine rupture associated with an interdelivery between 18 and 24 months. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2010;115:1003.
- Getahun D, et al. Previous cesarean delivery and risks of placenta previa and placental abruption. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2006;107:771.
- Conde-Agudelo A, et al. Effects of birth spacing on maternal health: A systematic review. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2007;196:297.
- Zhu BP, et al. Labor dystocia and its association with interpregnancy interval. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2006;195:121.